Legal Opinion

Luxemburg v. Frumkes

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 14, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Per Curiam.

The landlord having made out a prima facie case, it was error to dismiss at the close of her case. The burden of establishing the defense of res judicata was upon the tenant. (Grifen v. Keese, 187 N. Y. 454, 464; Reynolds v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 160 N. Y. 635, 651; Carter v. Beckwith, 128 N. Y. 312, 323.) There were new facts claimed to have occurred since the former trial which went to the question of the landlord’s good faith and immediate compelling necessity.

*189The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with $10 costs to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carter v. . BeckwithNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Griffen v. . KeeseNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Reynolds v. . Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Apostolic Faith Rescue Mission v. SlipyanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API