Ceaser v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEITH, Justice.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of robbery and the court assessed his punishment at confinement for ten years. There is no challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence and only a question of law is presented by the single ground of error.
The trial court conducted a pretrial hearing in accordance with Art. 28.01, V.A.C. C.P., and it is undisputed that appellant did not prior to such hearing file a motion electing to have the jury fix his punishment in the event he was convicted of the crime. However, before selection of the jury or the pleading to the indictment,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bullard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Barbee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Cuellar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Toney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
3Cited by18 opinions
- Harris County District Attorney's Office v. J.T.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- Grunsfeld v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Postell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Gallardo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
- Postell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.