Henry v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Broyles, O. J.
1. ‘“The testimony of a party -who offers himself as a witness in his own behalf is to be construed most strongly against him, when it is self-contradictory, vague, or equivocal.’ And unless there be other evidence tending to establish his right to recover, he ‘is not en*50titled to a finding in liis favor, if that version of his testimony the most unfavorable to him shows that the verdict should be against him.”’ Southern Ry. Co. v. Hobbs, 121 Ga. 428 (49 S. E. 294). Steele v. Central of Ga. Ry. Co., 123 Ga. 237 (51 S. E. 438) ; Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Evans, 96 Ga. 481 (23…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Southern Railway Co. v. HobbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Steele v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Sarman v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Long Cigar & Grocery Co. v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Eubanks v. MullisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Ezor v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Slaton MacHine Sales, Inc. v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Manees v. ScicchitanoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Clark v. Calhoun National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.