Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. Parsons

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 15, 1934No. 14674PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

We granted a rehearing in this ease because in the application for rehearing our attention was called to the ease of Commercial Bank of Lafayette & Trust Co. v. Barry, 179 La. 684, 154 So. 736, decided April 23,1934. The holding in that case, it was claimed, and our first impression was with some plausibility, that it was contrary to our views as expressed in our original opinion.

During the argument on rehearing we were also referred to Belknap Hardware & Mfg. Co. v. Hearn et al., 179 La. 909, 155 So. 396, decided May 21, 1934. After considering both of these cases very…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griffin & Dyson v. Cowan, Dykers & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
  2. Belknap Hardware & Mfg. Co. v. HearnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  3. Nancarow v. NelsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1818
  4. Commercial Bank of Lafayette & Trust Co. v. BarrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goldsmith v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. Phillips v. Gillaspie.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Goldsmith v. ParsonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API