Legal Opinion

Floyd v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 21, 1991No. 23315PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curium:

This is a post-conviction relief matter. The post-conviction relief judge, who also presided at petitioner’s trial, denied pe titioner’s application for post-conviction relief. We requested the parties to brief the issue whether this Court should modify or overrule its holding in Henry v. State, 275 S.C. 148, 268 S.E. (2d) 41 (1980), that it was permissible for a judge to preside at both a trial and subsequent post-conviction proceeding involving the same criminal matter. We now grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and dispense with further briefing. Further, we overrule…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Henry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BruceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  2. Alexander v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
  3. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  4. State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  5. State v. BruceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API