Legal Opinion

Bank of Chicago v. Hull

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1874PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon, Lambert Tree, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breese

There is nothing in the points made by appellant on this record. The proceedings show full compliance by the plaintiff below with the Practice act. The declaration was accompanied by an affidavit showing the nature of plaintiff’s demand and the amount due him, and to the affidavit he attached the bankbook, written up by the defendants, containing their own entries, and showing from their own figures the balance due the plaintiff. This was a full “ bill of particulars,” and none the less so, by being sworn to.

The statute (sec. 36) does not require the affidavit to be made by the plaintiff…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank of North America v. Chicago, Danville & Vincennes RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Loeb v. LoebAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API