Legal Opinion
Lester & Associates, P.C. v. Eneman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 26, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*907The plaintiff is a law firm, and commenced this action to recover damages for breach of contract, specifically certain legal fees it claims that the defendant failed to pay it pursuant to an agreement. After the defendant interposed an answer and the parties engaged in discovery, the defendant moved pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) for leave to serve an amended answer with counterclaims. In an affidavit, the defendant claimed that, during discovery, he learned that an employee of the plaintiff law firm, with whom he had communicated frequently and with whom he claimed to have discussed substantive…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Griggs v. GriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Higgins v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Cosh v. CoshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Naar v. I.J. Litwak & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- County of Westchester v. O'NeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Granata v. City of White PlainsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Kneip v. McWilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re Riven FlamebaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Riven FlamebaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012