Legal Opinion

Stotsky v. Gerring Industries, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward M. Horey, J.

The motion at bar is for a protective order. It is sought by the third-party defendant, Champion International Corporation, against the plaintiff, John Stotsky, under the authority of CPLR 3103.

Leading up to the motion was an attempt by the plaintiff to seek discovery and inspection of numerous documents alleged to be in the possession of the third-party defendant. Being unwilling to furnish the requested material, the third-party defendant brought the instant motion.

*373The applicable statute is CPLR 3120. The provisions of that statute provide that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Golatte v. MathewsDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1975
  2. Foote v. Joseph Bisceglia & Sons, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API