Commonwealth v. Smalis
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McDERMOTT, Justice.
In this appeal we are asked to decide whether appellant’s constitutional rights will be violated if her bench trial is resumed following an extended stay of the proceedings occasioned by the Commonwealth’s appeal from an order sustaining demurrers to certain, but not all, criminal charges.
Appellant, Despina Smalis, along with her husband, owned adjoining buildings located in the Oakland section of Pittsburgh. The premises housed the “Chances R” restaurant and lounge on the first floor and seven moderately-priced rental apartments on the second floor. On the morning…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Hazleton v. SmithCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Com. v. Collins, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. BobitskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. SmalisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991