Legal Opinion

Haley v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 7, 1952No. [No. 134, October Term, 1951.]PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence of the trial court, sitting without a jury, by the appellant, Carl R. Haley, who was charged on information with committing a certain unnatural and perverted sexual practice, on July 26, 1951, with a certain female named therein.

The appellant claims there was not sufficient evidence before the trial judge to convict him of the offense charged. The appellee claims the appellant is not entitled to question the sufficiency of the evidence because he failed to include the evidence in the appendix to his brief. As pointed out in many previous cases,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Compania Espanola De Navegacion Maritima, SA v. the NavemarSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Ex Parte MuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. In Re BaizSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  5. Madison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. State v. Devers and WebsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Schochet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Blake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  5. Diallo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API