Sisk v. Heil Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Geraldine Judy Sisk appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of The Heil Company in her action seeking damages for injuries sustained when she slipped and fell while on property owned by Heil. We affirm.
In reviewing a summary judgment, we must construe the evidence in the manner most favorable to the appellant, and we must resolve all doubts against the appellee. Motes v.Matthews, 497 So.2d 1121, 1123 (Ala. 1986). The evidence, construed in that manner, suggests the following facts:
Heil leased a portion of its premises to Alabama June Jam, Inc.,1 which was not a party to this action.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tolbert v. GulsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- McNulty v. HurleySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Motes v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Autry v. Roebuck Park Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Terry v. Life Ins. Co. of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ex Parte Mountain Top Indoor Flea MarketSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Sessions v. NonnenmannSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Dolgencorp, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Edwards v. Intergraph Services Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- South Alabama Brick Co. v. CarwieSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.