Legal Opinion

State v. Mahan

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 15, 1992No. 91-377PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, Justice.

Defendant, Steven Mickel Mahan, appeals from his conviction by jury trial of the public offense of indecent exposure in violation of Iowa Code section 709.9(2) (1989). He contends that the criminal prosecution should have been dismissed because the State failed to indict or inform against him within the forty-five-day period specified in Iowa Rule of Criminal Procedure 27(2)(a). After considering the arguments of the parties, we disagree with defendant’s contention and affirm the judgment of the district court.

Rule 27(2)(a), upon which defendant’s claim is based, provides that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SuncladesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. State v. HunzikerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. O'BRYANCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1994
  2. State of Iowa v. Cordero Robert SealsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015
  3. State of Iowa v. Tasha Nicole ComstockCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API