Coil v. Davis
Ohio Supreme Court
In Chancery. Bill for dower, brought here by appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. The appeal bond was filed in due time, and in a penal sum greater than double the amount of the decree, 165] *viz.: two hundred dollars, conditioned, “that, whereas, the above named John Davis obtained a decree in the Court of Common Pleas for said county of Pickaway, on the fifteenth day of November, instant, against Rachel Coil, in a suit in chancery, as by said decree, reference being had…
Read the full summary
In Chancery. Bill for dower, brought here by appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. The appeal bond was filed in due time, and in a penal sum greater than double the amount of the decree, 165] *viz.: two hundred dollars, conditioned, “that, whereas, the above named John Davis obtained a decree in the Court of Common Pleas for said county of Pickaway, on the fifteenth day of November, instant, against Rachel Coil, in a suit in chancery, as by said decree, reference being had thereto, will appear; and whereas, the said Rachel Coil gave notice on the records of said court, of her intention to…
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT.
The fifty-fifth section of the chancery act, 29 O. L. 80, provides for appealing chancery cases, by giving notice and security within the time allowed by law, in case of appeals from judgments at law. The act regulating appeals at law, 29 O. L. 78, requires bond to be given within thirty days after the close of the term of the court at which the judgment is rendered, with security, to be approved by the clerk, in double the amount of the judgment,' or decree mentioned, “conditioned for the payment of the full amount of the condemnation money in the Supreme Court, and costs, in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. SturgesU.S. Circuit Court for New York · 1826
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hartman v. Diller & GroffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Pier v. DuffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870