Legal Opinion

Wiggins v. Lord

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 28, 1953No. 34346PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.

UA new trial may be granted in all cases when any material evidence, not merely cumulative or impeaching in its character, but relating to new and material facts, shall be discovered by the applicant after the rendition of a verdict against him, and shall be brought to the notice of the court within the time allowed by law for entertaining a motion for a new trial.” Code, § 70-204. “A witness may be impeached by contradictory statements previously made by him as to matters relevant to his testimony and to the case. . .” § 38-1803. The testimony of E. D. Jones, as set out in the affidavit…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Hattaway v. DickensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Hawkins v. KermodeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  4. McKinnon v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Erskine & Co. v. DuffySupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lander Motors, Inc. v. Lee Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API