In Re Robert D. Jerabek
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
This is a consolidated appeal from two decisions of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (Board), sustaining the examiners’ rejection of all claims in related reissue applications, Serial Nos. 198,291 (the ’291 reissue application) and 198,526 (the ’526 reissue application). All claims in the two applications were rejected as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 because of obviousness, and also as violative of the duty of disclosure, set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 1.56(a), under 35 U.S.C. §§ 131 and 132. Additionally, claim 11 of the ’526 reissue…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Raytheon Company, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Roper Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- J.P. Stevens & Co. v. Lex Tex Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Jack E. Caveney and Roy A. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Specialty Composites, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Cabot Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Halliburton Company v. Schlumberger Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Pro-Mold and Tool Company, Inc. v. Great Lakes Plastics, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.