Legal Opinion

Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated v. Supreme International Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 28, 1999No. 98-1816PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge.

Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (“Anheuser”) appeals the district court’s 2 order dismissing Anheuser’s declaratory judgment action against Supreme International Corp. (“Supreme”) after refusing to apply the first-filed rale. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. FACTS

In January 1996, Anheuser began a national advertising campaign for Bud Ice beer that used a penguin in its design. In September 1996, Supreme acquired rights in penguin trademarks held by Munsingwear, Inc., which had been using penguin designs on golf and apparel since 1954.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  2. Orthmann v. Apple River Campground, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. Basf Corporation v. Darlene Symington, Next Friend or Guardian Ad Litem for Darci Symington, an IncompetentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. Supreme International Corp. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1997

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State of Missouri, Ex Rel. Jeremiah W. ("Jay") Nixon, Attorney General of Missouri v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc., Community PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  2. CBS Interactive Inc. v. National Football League Players Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
  3. Young v. Wells Fargo & Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2009
  4. Clergy Financial, LLC v. Clergy Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
  5. Central States Industrial Supply, Inc. v. McCulloughDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API