Legal Opinion
Optyl Eyewear Fashion International Corp. v. Style Companies, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 20, 1985No. 84-5695PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Lewis Anten, attorney for Style Companies, Ltd. (“Style”) appeals the district court’s imposition of sanctions against him for his conduct in seeking disqualification of opposing counsel. We affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Appellee Optyl Eyewear Fashion International Corp. (“Optyl”) brought suit against Style Companies, Ltd. (“Style”) for trademark infringement and unfair competition. Optyl alleged that Style sold jackets bearing the trademark “Carrera,” which is owned by Optyl.
In preparation for trial, Optyl sent letters to 1,100 of its customers in California,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Sealy, Incorporated, a Corporation v. Easy Living, Inc., a Corporation, and Danco, Inc., and Jack Ward Mattress, Inc., D/B/A Pacifica Mattress CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. American Gym, Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- International Electronics Corp. v. FlanzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Geraldine Marie Blodgett, in Re Hector C. Perez, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Duffey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
- Universal Bank, N.A. v. Marvel (In Re Marvel)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2000
- CJC Holdings, Inc. v. Wright & Lato, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1992
- Unioil, Inc. v. Hutton & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Bolding v. Banner BankDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.