Legal Opinion

Barnes v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 17, 1925No. Gen. No. 29,437PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff brought an action against the defendant, claiming that her son, John W. Simpson, had been killed by a mob and, therefore, she was entitled to recover by virtue of the provisions of “An Act to suppress mob violence,” in force July 1, 1905 [Cahill’s St. ch. 38, [f[f 537-542]. At the close of her case there was a directed verdict for the defendant, judgment was entered on the verdict and this writ of error followed.

The declaration was in two counts in each of which it was alleged that plaintiff’s son, John W. Simpson, was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. State v. AlerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Barnes v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Barnes v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Slaton v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  4. Earle v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API