Legal Opinion
GREER, KLOSIK AND DAUGHERTY v. Yetman
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 2, 1998No. S97G1041Published
1Opinion of the Court
496 S.E.2d 693 (1998)
269 Ga. 271
GREER, KLOSIK AND DAUGHERTY et al.
v.
YETMAN et al.
No. S97G1041.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
March 2, 1998.
Reconsideration Denied April 2, 1998.
John Fox Daugherty, Frank J. Klosik, Jr., Robert J. McCune, Greer, Klosik & Daugherty, Atlanta, for Greer Klosik & Daugherty et al.
Richard D.C. Schrade, Jr., Schrade & Richardson, Stockbridge, for Ione Edwards Yetman et al.
BENHAM, Chief Justice.
This appeal addresses the right of an attorney or a law firm to recover under a contingent fee contract of representation when the client terminates the contract after a judgment is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Demov, Morris, Levin & Shein v. GlantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Aflac, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- GREER, KLOSIK AND DAUGHERTY v. YetmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Walker v. Equitable Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Overman v. All Cities Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.