Cupit v. City of New Orleans ex rel. Board of Zoning Adjustments
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TERRI F. LOVE, Judge.
hVal C. Cupit, Joseph Wallace Johnson, Ralph Schindler, and Reed Hess (collectively “Plaintiffs”) seek review of the district court’s granting of the exception of no right of action filed by the City of New Orleans (“the City”). At the hearing on the exception of no right of action, the district court concluded that Plaintiffs have no standing to appeal a decision of the Board of Zoning Adjustments (“BZA”) be*863cause the Plaintiffs failed to prove specific harm. We find that Plaintiffs in this case have standing to seek judicial review of the BZA decision because the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- LA. HOTEL-MOTEL ASS'N v. Parish of East Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- Vieux Carre Property Owners, Residents & Associates, Inc. v. Hotel Royal, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Green v. Garcia-VictorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Faubourg Marigny Improvement Ass'n v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Gebre v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Spilsbury v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Suzanne Wimsatt v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019