Commonwealth v. Randall

WIEAND, Judge:

Nathaniel Randall was tried non-jury and found guilty of unauthorized use of an automobile. 1 On appeal, his sole contention is that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that he knew he lacked the owner’s permission to drive the vehicle. 2 We disagree and affirm the judgment of sentence.

“In testing the sufficiency of the .. . evidence, we proceed in several steps. First, we accept as true all the evidence upon which the finder of fact could properly have reached its verdict. Next we give the Commonwealth the benefit of all reasonable inferences arising from that…