Legal Opinion
Stanford v. Holloway
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided June 21, 1941PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, P. J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries that occurred in an automobile collision and resulted in death. The action was instituted by Sam Holloway before his death; he died of the injuries for which his suit was brought, and left a widow and children, and the suit was proceeded with (without revivor) by the widow for the use and benefit of herself and children. Code, sec. 8238.
The defendant filed two pleas: (1) This suit should have been prosecuted under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Code, secs. 6851-6901, and not under Code, sec. 8238. (2) Not guilty.
The plaintiff filed a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Power Packing Co. v. BorumCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
- Butner v. . WhitlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Deantonio v. New Haven Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Schoepp v. GeretySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Philpot v. Fifth Ave. Coach Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- National Biscuit Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Atlantic Greyhound Corp. v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Hopper v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953
- Smith v. BullingtonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
- Davis v. SparkmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.