Christensen v. Otis
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMouton, J.
Plaintiff was employed by defendant in his greenhouse at Lake Charles. He worked there for a period of thirty weeks at $30 per week, making a total of' $900 for his services upon which he received $480, leaving a balance of $420 for which be sued and recovered judgment from defendant with legal interest from. July 1, 1929.
*421The only defense is one of incompetency on which is based a reconventional demand for $450 for damages to the plants of defendant.
On this issue defendant testified that some of his chrysanthemums had died, while Porter, a colored boy who worked in the greenhouse, said the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gollain v. JametSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
- Wilds & Co. v. Barrett & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
- Darramon v. FollinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1839