Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Otis

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1931No. 723Published

1Opinion of the CourtMouton, J.

Plaintiff was employed by defendant in his greenhouse at Lake Charles. He worked there for a period of thirty weeks at $30 per week, making a total of' $900 for his services upon which he received $480, leaving a balance of $420 for which be sued and recovered judgment from defendant with legal interest from. July 1, 1929.

*421The only defense is one of incompetency on which is based a reconventional demand for $450 for damages to the plants of defendant.

On this issue defendant testified that some of his chrysanthemums had died, while Porter, a colored boy who worked in the greenhouse, said the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gollain v. JametSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  2. Wilds & Co. v. Barrett & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  3. Darramon v. FollinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1839

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API