Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re A.C.V.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 20, 2010No. COA09-1199Published

1ConcurrenceWynn, Judge

The majority opinion notes that “[i]t is difficult, under the circumstances of this case, to conclude that [the Respondent-father’s] constitutional rights were assured through the application of section 7B-llll(a)(5).” I write separately to point out that we do not reach the constitutional issue because, under North Carolina law, the biological father in this case did not demonstrate his entitlement to the constitutionally protected status of a parent.

It is well settled that “the protection of the family unit is guaranteed not only by the Due Process Clause, but also by the Equal Protection…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Petersen v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Owenby v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  5. In Re Adoption of AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API