Legal Opinion

Wildey v. Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Yan Burén. -(Mills, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover insurance on a horse, harness, cushion and blanket, burned on the 6th of October, 1881, at a hotel barn in the village of Paw Paw near and within one hundred feet of other buildings.

The defense was that the policy did not cover this property when used and situated as it was when destroyed.

Defendant is a mutual fire insurance company organized under the statute of 1873, [How, St. ch. 132] and formed for the purpose of farm insurance. The entire property insured consisted of dwelling-house and contents, three barns and sheds and an item described as follows: “ Per-

sonal…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carney v. DuniwayOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Village of L'Anse v. Fire Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Benton v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API