Legal Opinion

Cooley v. Ayres

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 26, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Certiorari from Polh District Court. — W. S. Ayres, Judge. On information duly filed, the plaintiff was convicted of having violated a liquor injunction, and in certiorari proceedings, contests the validity of such conviction. —

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

i. judgment: non-moalfieatio'n by collateral record: eertiorari: intoxicating liquors, The county attorney, in the name of the state, filed a petition praying that the plaintiff herein be enjoined from . , . . ,. . maintaining a liquor nuisance. The defendant answered, and a written decree, signed by the trial judge, purporting to be rendered on January 26, 1916, was entered of record. It recited that:

“Now on this 26th day of January, 1.916, the same he*742ing one of the regular days of the January, 1916, term of this court, the application of the plaintiff herein came on for hearing, the State…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Case v. PlatoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  2. Kennedy v. Citizens' National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Callanan v. VotrubaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. Balm v. NunnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  5. Coffey v. GambleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WielandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  2. Anthony v. WagnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. Storie v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Sergio v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. Wolfe v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API