Northern Group Services, Inc. v. Auto Owners Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
A group of automobile insurance companies challenge a ruling on summary judgment that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq., preempted the Michigan No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act, Mich.Comp.Laws § 500.3109a, to the extent that the Michigan law allows policy provisions which conflict with ERISA plans. ERISA’s preemption provision, 29 U.S.C. § 1144(a), provides in relevant part:
Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the provisions of this sub-chapter and subchapter III of this chapter shall supersede any…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Northern Group Services, Inc. v. Auto Owners Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Teamsters Pension Trust Fund-Board of Trustees of the Western Conference v. Allyn Transportation Co., Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund, Plaintiff/counterdefendants/appellees v. Landy Corporation, and Landy Leasing, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, Defendant/counterclaimant/appellant. Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund, Plaintiff/counterdefendants/appellees v. Landy Corporation, and Energy Carriers, Inc., Defendant/counterclaimant/appellant. Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund, Plaintiff/counterdefendants/appellees v. Landy Corporation, Defendant/counterclaimant/appellant, and Energy Carriers and Landy Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987