Legal Opinion

McLosky v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1923No. 7 Div. 881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The prosecution against this defendant was for a violation of section 7564 of the Code 1907, as amended by Acts 1915, p. 661. The complaint filed by the solicitor, and upon which he was tried in the circuit court, is as follows:

"The state of Alabama, by its solicitor, complains of F.C. McClosky, whose Christian name is unknown, that, within twelve months before the commencement of this prosecution, he, the said F.C. McClosky did practice or engage in the business of treating of diseases of human beings without a license, contrary to law." Smith v. State, 8 Ala. App. 352, 63 So. 28.

Defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bibb v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  2. Porter & Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Morgan v. Whatley & WhatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McLosky v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Sanford v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Ford v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API