Legal Opinion
Donald B. Rice, Secretary of the Air Force v. Martin Marietta Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 4, 1994No. 93-1025PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
The Secretary of the Air Force (the government) appeals from the June 5,1992 decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the ASBCA), No. 35895, pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 607(g)(1). The ASBCA concluded that Defense Acquisition Regulation (DAR) 15-203(c) (codified at 32 C.F.R. § 15.203(c) (1984)) 1 and Cost Accounting Standard (CAS) 410 (codified at 4 C.F.R. § 410 (1984)) conflicted because DAR 15-203(c) required that general and administrative (G & A) expenses be allocated to individual costs in the G & A allocation…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The United States v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. Sean C. O'keefe, Acting Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- General Electric Company, Aerospace Group v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hercules Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Boeing North American, Inc. v. James G. Roche, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense v. United Technologies Corporation, Pratt & WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Teledyne, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- United States v. Kenneth HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.