Legal Opinion

Ritterhoff v. Puget Sound National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1905No. 5450PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Bell, J., eutered September 20, 1901, upon overruling a demurrer to the complaint, granting a permanent injunction as prayed for in the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This is an action in equity to enjoin appellant from asserting any demand against respondents, or either of them, upon a certain pretended promissory note, *78or in any manner transferring or indorsing the same. The complaint, which was verified on February 12, 1904, in substance alleges, that the plaintiff William Ritterhoff is an unmarried man, a resident of Seattle, King county, Washington; that he has been, at all the times mentioned in the complaint, and still is, an invalid, suffering from paralysis; that he owns real and personal property within King county, Washington, of the reasonable…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boyce's Executors v. GrundySupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. The New-York and New Haven R.R. v. . Schuyler, Cross, C.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Sharon v. TerryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1888
  4. Grand Chute v. WinegarSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Fuller v. PercivalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fleming's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Bullard v. ZimmermanMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Fredenberg v. WhitneyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1917
  4. Owens v. MoraineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API