Benard v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
ROBERTS, Judge.
In its motion for rehearing, the State maintains that appellant’s plea of former conviction was properly overruled by virtue of Art. 28.13, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., and our holding in the case of Harrison v. State, 409 S.W.2d 848 (Tex.Cr.App.1966). The State contends that the holding in Waller v. Florida, 397 U.S. 387, 90 S.Ct. 1184, 25 L.Ed.2d 435 (1969) does not affect Art. 28.13 or our holding in Harrison v. State, supra, because Waller only overruled the “dual sovereignty” fiction which had been followed by a number of states, not including Texas.
A…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. HayeWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.