United States v. Brown
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LEISURE, District Judge:
Defendant Michael Brown moves pro se to correct his alleged illegal sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) on the ground that the imposition of a special parole term was no longer part of the punishment pursuant to the amended provisions of Title 21, United States Code, Section 841. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.
The Court has reviewed defendant’s undated motion; and defendant’s letter dated January 31, 1988, received by the Court on February 8, 1988. By letter dated January 19, 1988, the Government opposed the motion. Letter of Assistant United States…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. John GrammatikosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Luz-Estella Alvarez-Porras, Jose Garcia-Perez, and Roberto Colon-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Floyd F. Capo, Amos Lisenby, Cody Lisenby, Tim Williams, John BookerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Zapatero v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Santos-Reyes v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989