Commonwealth v. Leet
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
CIRILLO, President Judge,
dissenting:
Because I am firmly convinced that a sheriff and his or her deputies are vested by the Pennsylvania constitution with all the powers and duties of a peace officer, including the authority to arrest for a summary traffic violation committed in his or her presence, I would reverse the trial court’s order suppressing the evidence obtained from Leet as a result of the roadside stop conducted by Deputy Sheriff Gibbons. This conclusion is based upon a careful study of the history of the powers and duties of the sheriff and his traditional role in the enforcement…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Commonwealth v. MilyakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. StonerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.