Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Leet

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 23, 1991No. 462Published

1Dissent

CIRILLO, President Judge,

dissenting:

Because I am firmly convinced that a sheriff and his or her deputies are vested by the Pennsylvania constitution with all the powers and duties of a peace officer, including the authority to arrest for a summary traffic violation committed in his or her presence, I would reverse the trial court’s order suppressing the evidence obtained from Leet as a result of the roadside stop conducted by Deputy Sheriff Gibbons. This conclusion is based upon a careful study of the history of the powers and duties of the sheriff and his traditional role in the enforcement…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Commonwealth v. MilyakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. StonerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API