Legal Opinion

Margaret Pulera v. Town of Richmond

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2017No. 2015AP001119PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1.

PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, C.J.

This appeal comes before the court on certification by the court of appeals.1 Margaret Pulera (Pulera) appeals dismissals of the petitions for certiorari review of highway orders recorded in Rock2 and Walworth3 Counties. The issue certified is: what event triggers the thirty-day period under Wis. Stat. § 68.13(1) (2013-14)4 during which certiorari review may be obtained for a town board's highway order. To address this issue, we must interpret the terms of § 68.13(1), the statute affording certiorari review, in accord with Wis. Stat. § 82.15, the statute…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bruno v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Marder v. BD. OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF WISC. SYSTEMWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clean Wisconsin, Inc. v. DNRWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Zelman v. Town of ErinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  3. Leith Holdings, LLC v. Wis. Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
  4. Margaret Pulera v. Town of RichmondWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API