Legal Opinion

In Re B.T.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 2010No. 10-0383PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this mandamus proceeding, we consider whether the juvenile court abused its discretion when it did not obtain a complete diagnostic evaluation of a juvenile prior to a hearing to transfer the juvenile to adult criminal court. The Family Code mandates a “complete diagnostic study,” and the psychologist who performed this report emphasized it was incomplete. We hold the trial court abused its discretion, a determination the State does not dispute, and we conditionally grant the petition for writ of mandamus.

B.T. is a 17-year-old charged with murdering his teacher. In 2009, the State filed a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In re N.J. A.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. L. M. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. R. K. A. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pipkin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  2. In Re BTTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Heblen Kanan, Pharr Plantation Inc. and Pharr Plantation Management Co., Ltd. v. Plantation Homeowner's Association, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2012
  4. In the Matter of P.Z.E., a Juvenile v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2024
  5. In the Matter of W.J.G.L., a Juvenile v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API