Legal Opinion

In re Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Prods. Liab. Litig.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided August 2, 2018No. MDL No. 2846PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SARAH S. VANCE, Chair

Before the Panel:* Plaintiffs in fifteen of the actions listed on Schedule A pending in seven districts move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation in the Southern District of Ohio or, alternatively, the Western District of Missouri. Plaintiffs in more than 30 actions support centralization in one or both of these districts. Plaintiffs' motion involves 53 actions pending in 21 districts, as listed on Schedule A.1 The Panel also has been notified of 69 potentially-related actions ("potential tag-along actions") pending in 27 districts.2

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dunham v. Covidien LPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  2. Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  3. Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
  4. Krulewich v. Covidien LPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  5. Sarkissian v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API