Legal Opinion

Suber v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 2017No. ED 104555PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Colleen Dolan, Judge

I. Introduction

Carlos A. Súber (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief and request for an evidentiary hearing arguing the motion court was without jurisdiction to revoke his probation under § 559.036.8, because his probationary period had ended.1 The motion court found that it had the authority to revoke Movant’s probation because it had manifested an intent to do so during the term of Movant’s probation, put Movant on notice of this intent, and made every reasonable effort to conduct the revocation hearing…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coates v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Strauser v. MartinezSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. State ex rel. Stimel v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Petree v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Byron Robinson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ban v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  3. State ex rel. Boswell v. HarmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. NICK E. JOHNSON, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Nastassja McCullough v. MHMR of Tarrant CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API