Dalton v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ELDER, Judge.
Paul Michael Dalton, Jr. (appellant) appeals his conviction of first degree- murder. He contends the trial court erred when it refused to instruct the jury on the crime of accessory after the fact to murder. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand.
I
FACTS
Appellant was charged with three crimes: (1) murder “in the commission of or attempt to commit robbery,” (2) murder, and (3) “use [of] a shotgun in committing or attempting to commit murder or robbery.” None of the indictments against appellant expressly charged him with being an accessory after the fact to any of these…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Frye v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
- Darnell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- Barrett v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DaltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Dalton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
- Commonwealth v. DaltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Dalton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
- Dalton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998