Legal Opinion

Halliday v. Wright

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Motion, to dismiss Writ of Error. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion -of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.:

This was an action of replevin brought by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error. The property seized was redelivered to tlje defendant below upon his giving a forthcoming- bond under the statute (§ 1719 Rev. Stats.) with Uriah Bowden and Thomas Jackson as sureties thereon. The cause was tried on May 15th, 1900, and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs below to the following effect: That the plaintiffs do have and recover judgment against the defendant Halliday for the property (specifically describing it), and further, that the said plaintiffs do…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crites v. LittletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glass v. Continental Guaranty Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1921
  2. Evans v. Cheyenne Cement Stone & Brick Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Henry v. WhitehurstSupreme Court of Florida · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API