Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Kott
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 30, 2024No. 6:24-cv-00484Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JEANNENE MITCHELL, Plaintiff, Case. No. 6:24-cv-484-MC v. OPINION & ORDER SHELLY KOTT, et al., Defendants. _____________________________ MCSHANE, Judge: Pro se plaintiff Jeannene Mitchell seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). This court has discretion in deciding whether to grant in forma pauperis status. See O'Loughlin v. Doe,
920 F.2d 614, 616
(9th Cir. 1990). To qualify for in forma pauperis status, a civil litigant must demonstrate both that the litigant is unable to pay court fees and that the claims the litigant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- J. O'LOughLin v. John Doe, a Member of the Medical Staff Who Administers Medications at 5:00 P.M. Director of Adult DetentionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Dunn v. City of MilwaukieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Dickson v. TrimetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018