City of Healdsburg v. Mulligan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County and from an order denying a new trial. R. F. Cbawford, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
This is an action brought upon the official bond of George Y. Mulligan, as treasurer of the city of Healdsburg, and his sureties, to recover the sum of three thousand five hundred and forty-one dollars and forty-nine cents with interest thereon, which moneys, it is alleged, were received by said treasurer on or about October 20, 1893, and which, in breach of his said trust, said Mulligan converted to his own use, and *209refused to account to the plaintiff therefor, or to pay out said sum on the warrant of the president of the board of trustees, countersigned by the clerk thereof.
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thomson v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- United States v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- United States v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Boyden v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Muzzy v. ShattuckCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States Leasing Corp. v. duPontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Wiley v. City of SpartaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- County of Sonoma v. StofenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Van Trees v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Thornton v. Athens Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.