State v. Glenn
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.
This- appeal involves two questions. • Was the indictment sufficient to permit the defendant to be convicted as an aider and abettor of others having sexual intercourse with a sixteen-year-old girl? Was there any evidence that the defendant aided and abetted others in having sexual intercourse, with this girl?
The indictment charging contributing to the delinquency of a child was as follows:
“* * * David Hugh Glenn * * * ¿id * * * unlawfully * * * do an act, to-wit: engage in sexual intercourse with the said [girl] * * * which said act did manifestly then and there tend to cause the said [girl]…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. RosserOregon Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. WeitzelOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. MacLarenOregon Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. LeBrunCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. CapitanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- State v. BlackwellOregon Supreme Court · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.