Legal Opinion

Perkins v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 7, 2007No. A07A2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

In this interlocutory appeal, Helen Perkins contends the trial court erred by ruling before trial that she could not inform the jury of the specific mandatory minimum sentence and fine for trafficking in cocaine. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

The right of cross-examination is not abridged where examination is limited by the trial judge to relevant matters by proper questioning. Controlling the scope or extent of cross-examination is a matter resting within the sound discretion of the trial court and, in the absence of an abuse of discretion in controlling…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. VoglesonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. Bellamy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  3. Hodo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  4. Dooley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Bosnak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Haggard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Perkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API