Raif v. State

Candler, Justice.

In these cases questions exactly alike have been certified by the Court of Appeals to this court for answer. In each case no answer to the second question propounded is requested unless the first question is answered in the affirmative. The first question so propounded is a mixed question of law and fact and for that reason cannot be answered by this court. For some of the cases so holding, see Lynch v. Southern Express Co., 146 Ga. 68 (90 SE 527); Southern Exchange Bank v. First Nat. Bank of Dublin, 165 Ga. 289 (140 SE 753); Johnston v. Travelers Ins. Co., 183 Ga. 229 (188…