Legal Opinion

Grant v. City of Twin Falls

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1991No. 17976Published

1Opinion of the Court

813 P.2d 880 (1991)

120 Idaho 69

Curtis GRANT and Robert Grant, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CITY OF TWIN FALLS, Defendant, and

Ronald E. Axtman and K.A. McDowell, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 17976.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, November 1989 Term.

June 26, 1991.

Lojek & Gabbert, Boise, for plaintiffs-appellants. Donald W. Lojek, argued.

Benoit, Alexander, Sinclair, Doerr, Harwood & High, Twin Falls, for defendants-respondents. Fritz A. Wonderlich, argued.

BISTLINE, Justice.

On August 21, 1982, Curtis and Robert Grant were involved in an altercation at the Windbreak Bar in Twin Falls. The bar's bouncer…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API