Legal Opinion

TMX CONSTRUCTION v. REVOLUTION PIPELINE

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 2022No. 2023 OK CIV APP 39Published

1Opinion of the Court

OSCN Found Document:TMX CONSTRUCTION v. REVOLUTION PIPELINE

Previous Case

Top Of Index

This Point in Index

Citationize

Next Case

Print Only

TMX CONSTRUCTION v. REVOLUTION PIPELINE

2023 OK CIV APP 39

Case Number: 119812

Decided: 12/07/2022

Mandate Issued: 10/26/2023

DIVISION II

THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, DIVISION II

Cite as: 2023 OK CIV APP 39, __ P.3d __

TMX CONSTRUCTION, Plaintiff/Appellee,

v.

REVOLUTION PIPELINE, LLC, Defendant/Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF

OKLAHOMA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA

HONORABLE RICHARD C. OGDEN, TRIAL JUDGE

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

Lambe…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Davis v. LeitnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
  4. Residential Funding Real Estate Holdings, LLC v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  5. Roberson v. Jeffrey M. Waltner, M.D., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API