Legal Opinion
Dawson v. City of Kent
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 28, 1988No. C87-104-APublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed this action against defendants City of Kent (City) and one of its officials, Ronald Craig, seeking redress under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs claim of deprivation of her fourth amendment rights was dismissed by summary judgment entered for defendant on January 25, 1988. Leave was granted for filing a further motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether plaintiffs fourteenth amendment due process rights were violated. That motion as well as plaintiffs response is now before the court.
Pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lombard v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
- Bovee v. Coopers & LybrandDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Rush v. City of MansfieldDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
- Hrivnak v. NCO Portfolio Management, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Kaylor v. Holsinger (In Re Holsinger)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.