Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Schomig

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 5, 2001No. 4-01-0231PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

In January 2001, plaintiff, Anthony E. Robinson, an inmate at Pontiac Correctional Center (Pontiac), filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging that defendant, James M. Schomig, the Pontiac warden, had violated his due process rights in numerous disciplinary proceedings over several years. In February 2001, the trial court dismissed the petition, upon finding that it did not state a proper habeas corpus claim. Robinson appeals, and we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

In January 2001, Robinson filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging that (1) he was being unlawfully restrained…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hughes v. KileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Barney v. Prisoner Review BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adcock v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Mason v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Mason v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Mason v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API