Legal Opinion

State v. Randall

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1904No. 5325PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Denney, J., entered June 4, 1904, upon a trial and conviction of the crime of burglary.

1Opinion of the Court

Mount, J. —

Appellant was convicted of an attempt to commit the crime of burglary. Upon this appeal no briefs have been filed on behalf of the state, and no appearance of any hind has been made by respondent. We are therefore led to infer that the correctness of the point made by the appellant and hereinafter discussed is confessed. Appellant demurred to the information upon the ground that it is not sufficient under the statute. This demurrer was overruled and appellant alleges this ruling as error.

*439Tlie statute defining burglary is as follows:

“Every person who shall unlawfully enter in the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. First State Bank of Windom v. McElwrathCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. State v. NeffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API