Legal Opinion

O'Dowd v. Wabash Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circnit Court. — Hon. Thomas J. Seehorn, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBroaddus, P. J.

— This is a suit for damages, the alleged result of defendant’s negligence.

*661The plaintiff, an experienced switchman, while engaged as such in defendant’s employ, was injured in September, 1908, in its Kansas City yards, immediately north of the Union Depot. He had been in defendant’s employment for more than one year, and was familiar with the yards and the manner in which the business of switching was conducted. In the switch yards there are numerous tracks, but it will only be necessary to account for those that relate particularly to the issues of the case. There was a main track running…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brands v. St. Louis Car Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Chrismer v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Cunningham v. Journal Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Craig v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  2. Melcher v. Freehold Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Sustar v. Bambrick Bros. Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API